its been going downhill for years. starmer needs to go but apparently its more complicated than i thought. always thought a simple vote of no confidence was enough. they're literally arresting children and old people for how they think. Orwell knew.
then there's this C37h At least 250,000 white British girls were raped by predominantly Pakistani men. Think about that… British Police and Government treated the girls like the guilty. People need to face the ultimate punishment. This is what Starmer should be focused on. Pure evil.
The place history usually considers "India" many times is this place that today we call Pakistan. Hence why when the British empire conquered India the word Paki became prevalent in England. Same as when the Catholics conquered our "India" over here in the southwest and the Protestants the India of the Northeast. Of course the Frankist gonna Frank no matter where they are in the middle but they always in the middle. Shit this goes all the way back to all the way back before Alexander Magnum or the Trojans and even the Durexians. There are these other Indians that people forget about. The people of the mana song.
IDK how you could read the outline of the Iran-US deal and not interpret it as the USA getting absolutely buttfucked. Iran gets: $300 billion commitment from US and some GCC countries to build their economy Termination of all US and UN sanctions, even secondary sanctions Access to frozen assets ($100 billion) Legal able to export oil with banking and insurance access (did not have before the war) USA gets: A promise to not pursue nuclear A 60-day negotiating window to discuss the enriched uranium Iran's economy was in the fucking toilet before the war started Trump is essentially going to build up Iran stronger than it has ever been under IRGC rule All IRGC has to do is comply with the deal, allow Trump and IAEA to remove enriched uranium, receive all benefits of the deal then once their financials are better than ever, build nuclear and enrich more uranium Iran's economy, before the war started, was spiraling down
it's pretty confusing especially since everyone seems to have an opinion on it immediately. from what i understand DJT hasn't signed anything and committed to nothing thus far. as you've outlined it i agree we'd be getting fucked. also hear the leftist loons screaming taco while Trump is saying this as of a couple of hours ago https://x.com/atrupar/status/2067283094814507363?s=20 that MOU is 60 days without a signature so...did Rubio bring him this? where did it come from? lot of questions before i'm reacting at this point. lot of people on both sides jumping in to try and make the man look bad. can't believe he'd suddenly take his boot off their throats and give them everything w zero in return. literally makes no sense.
They are gay. That is why. Fake and gay. Babylonian like LeBron James beard and hairline. Hence all they can be is confused. Confused as to why they cant gloat. Fake and gay people can only gloat or be confused. It is what happens when you live in Babylon for too long. When a bully cant gloat what does he have left? Pride. And if in this age people still believe pride is a natural and good thing it is because they are fake and gay too.
Clearly copied this but makes the point i was trying to make far more eloquently. This guy has been putting out great content just about every day. Here's a good bit about how the media and anti-Trumpers are all shitting on the Iran deal without knowing anything about what is actually in the Iran deal. Two themes ran like vines through yesterday’s comments. First, some readers, apparently unaware where my “lucky presidents” reference came from, pushed back (gently). Less gently, other readers said they already feel gypped by the “bad” Iran deal— even before the terms are public. Let’s tackle both, especially the second one, because gypped is exactly how corporate media wants you to feel. I tried to squash that narrative yesterday, but it’s taken root like mutant crabgrass. Let’s pluck it out. ⛑️ If you ever manage to get a liberal to debate you about Trump without them resorting to name-calling, storming off, or spontaneously combusting, you will eventually reach a point where they are confronted with undeniable evidence that Trump did something right. Usually, they have a pre-packaged answer, fresh from the New York Times’ talking-points lab. Sure, the stock market is up a little, but it only helps rich people. What about gas prices? K-shaped recovery! Occasionally, though, you might point out something for which they don’t have a handy, pre-packaged media dismissal. When that happens, they fall back to their default setting, which is something along the lines of, “Well, even a blind squirrel can occasionally find an acorn.” (They really shouldn’t be bringing up Peanut the squirrel, but whatever. We’ll roll with it.) In other words, if they can’t minimize an accomplishment or claim that Joe Biden actually did it while sleepwalking, they’ll just call Trump the unwitting beneficiary of good fortune. He just got lucky. My response to that is simple: even if that were true —even if Trump’s successes are purely the result of him stumbling backward into a pot of gold— I will take a lucky president any day of the week. “Lucky” is infinitely better than “smart.” Smart presidents can have bad luck, and where does that leave us? Usually, it leaves us broke, entangled in a foreign war, and paying fourteen dollars for a dozen eggs. Checkmate. In other words, I’ve co-opted the progressives’ silly argument, and the weekend’s fortuitous meteorological events (after the Democrats celebrated the bad weather way too early) gave me the perfect opportunity to rub it in a little harder. To be clear, I don’t actually believe in luck. I’m with Einstein on this one: God does not play lotto with the universe. (Or words to that effect. Einstein was probably too busy inventing gravity to buy scratch-offs.) ⛑️ More significantly, a not inconsiderable number of folks shared feelings verging on downright pessimistic about the Iran War. It was too expensive, took too long, killed too many soldiers, raised gas prices, and now look: it didn’t even destroy the IRGC and all we’re getting is a crappy tourist t-shirt with the word “Strait” misspelled in “I the Straight of Hormuz!” Let me tell you what’s going to happen. The minute corporate media gets its sweaty, panic-mongering hands on the details of this deal, all we are going to hear is how horrible and gyppy it is. That’s the narrative they’ve already written. And that’s exactly why I am pre-debunking it right now. I am boldly taking the position that I do not care what the terms of the deal are. As I said yesterday, the terms don’t even matter, because when you compare it to literally every other Middle East conflict we’ve ever stumbled into, the Iran operation was shorter by an order of magnitude and billions of times better for America. Just count up the benefits we already know about. The Iran operation ended OPEC— within two months! It got all the fractious countries over there on the same page, made a joke out of the Useless Nations, starved China of oil, put America on top of global energy for the first time in history, pressured the Europeans, et cetera. None of our previous Middle Eastern adventures did anything helpful at all; they just made everything worse. So, here is my warning. If anyone dares me to defend the terms of some Trump-Iran deal that corporate media and Team Candace call horrible, here is what I will do. Remember, I warned them. I will say that’s fine, please compare it to all the other Middle East peace deals that other presidents have negotiated. After all, if we want to be intellectually honest —a concept the media abandoned sometime around 1994— we can’t just criticize the Iran deal in a vacuum. We need benchmarks. We need context. How can we possibly tell how truly stinky the Iran deal is without recalling all the super-terrific, totally-not-disastrous deals that past Middle Eastern wars have produced? So let’s go ahead and pull the records on Bush’s Iraq, Obama’s JCPOA, and 20 years of Afghanistan. Let’s compare those deals to the Iran deal, and see which one ended best. Let’s contrast what we got from each previous war-slash-deal to what we get from Iran. Let’s compare the total cost of the 20-year Afghanistan war and the 8-year Iraq war with the cost of Trump’s three-month Iran war. I bet we will discover some nifty statistics. And to be perfectly fair, I will let the critics who are unhappy with the deal (which, again, they haven’t seen yet) do all those calculations for themselves and then report back. There really isn’t anything to talk about until those comparisons have been made. Or, better yet, we could just refuse to step into the media’s narrative trap of criticizing the Iran deal without historical context.
https://x.com/Osint613/status/2067633713500885204 Q: What's to stop Iran from rebuilding their nuclear program down the road? Vance: Iran would need a lot of money to rebuild their nuclear program, they would need billions and billions. Oh, so a few months of selling oil to get all that money after they trick the US into thinking they've fundamentally changed and release all the money and lift the sanctions. Thinking the IRGC is going to fundamentally change for a little bit of change is the literally fucking retarded Kind of like thinking China would move away from communism if they were brought into the world's economy That worked out well Iran's gonna fake it to get the perks then they're going to rebuild stronger than ever Economic incentives don't change the long-term goals of authoritarian or ideological regimes
I agree that Iran won't play fair long-term, but they've been militarily emasculated dor a long time. And to get back to where they used to be? Billions? Try a trillion ... maybe triple that. Worst of all, their supposed religious leaders would loooove to see millions more Iranians die to honor Allah. And still, I didn't want into this quagmire, but once in, fuck it - destroy all monsters--- Godzilla & Ganera forever, man. ... but I can only wonder how Iran would've managed the threat they presented in 2026 if they hadn't been handed billions in 2016 by 44. Overall, this is a massive goatfuck.