OFF-TOPIC Thread

The problem is that The Donald would have to work hard to be a bigger media whore than Obomber


Now he might do just that.. but a posse of 500?!?

Nothing like showing off your little pin dick

 

Shit don't be a hater come to the winners. Endowment usually isn't lacking in African Americans.

 

floating around the net this morning

"Imagine what Republican's would have said if Barack Obama featured his 5 kids from 3 different women at his convention in 2008"


This whole thing is going to get way uglier in the next 90 days
The only good news is that most of America, nearly 60%, cannot stand either one of them
Per the sources I'd seen we've NEVER had a presidential election where BOTH candidates had negative approval ratings

 

Is there a Democrat alive who doesn't "answer" a question about another one with a retort about some past Republican?
I dont think so...not even here on either. They are incapable of not answering that way, or...if they cant think of an answer like that, they call you a name like "that's racist".
So weak...

 

Geez, you fuck ONE donkey and...

 

Someone posted that Edward Snowdon would have a new expose about the Clinton campaign before the election. I wonder if those "Russian hackers" were the Wikileaks guy himself ? And if this was it?
You read it here first...
Also, sadly another German suicide bombing...

 

CNN reported that the Russian hackers were in the server for nearly a year before they were ousted. I guess it took them that long to get useful dirt. Snowden did run to Russia and he is wikileaks so it follows a logical trail. Getting dirtier.

 

Being in the server for a year, there might be more coming...

 

I doubt there is more but I won't put any money on it.

 

Voting for someone just because they are a female, is complete bullshit.

Gender being not necessarily interchangeable, but someone switching based on a genetic mutation at birth or something of that nature, is supported by science. Obviously there's limits here, and morons will always take advantage of it.

I struggle with people who are too far left as much as with people who are too far right.

 

Like no one has voted because they were white males? Of course that has NEVER happened in all of US history.

 

The point I was trying to make is that it's incredibly stupid to vote for a candidate based on traits like that.

 

So let's not couch it in terms of this year as an affirmative action year. In over 200 years we've had 1 minority president....and now possibly our first woman president. Was no one else qualified in the history of this country?

Don't make the equally absurd insinuation that every white male ever elected to the Presidency was qualified to be one.

 

So I understand, you're saying that one should vote for Hillary because she is a woman?
Because you believe at some point people voted because they were white males?
Whoa.

 

You are absolutely right..to vote for an individual simply based on gender is a farce and ignorant.
And because there have been no women before is a fool's reason to vote for one now.

 

No Blue....what you don't seem to understand is that all this pseudo talk about qualifications...voting "just because" is always....ALWAYS stated by conservatives in terms of minorities or women? GEEZ! I wonder why?

I guess all white males are immune to such criticism...or maybe just white male conservatives. Again, I wonder why?

Sounds pretty convenient to me.

Right now, your candidate, a raving lunatic, silver spoon born, inherited, steak salesman, who has filed more BKs than I can count....and with that I actually have professional knowledge of how shabbily he runs things....is you nominee. AND you are saying Hillary is somehow getting a pass?

That's rich. No pun intended.

 

You don't vote for a candidate based on their gender, race, whatever. You vote for them based on what beliefs they have, the direction they want the country to go, etc. I'm sure there have been plenty of deserving minorities/women over the years, but like I said, you don't simply vote for someone solely because they're white, a minority, or a woman.

 

People voting for one candidate or the other based on gender, female or male, are the extreme minority. Why are we talking about it (honest question)?

 

Because people here are implying that this is the only reason people might vote for Hillary over Trump.

Hillary is WAY more qualified than Trump....and Trump is a very VERY dangerous person to even contemplate being president of the USA.