true points those but viewing on such narrow slicing as who's best 22/162 and then who best 23/162 and then frothing changing it all around again on 24/162 and different again changing the rankings based on 25/162. Some typically under performing team has a good week and suddenly their the going to win the WS? Hardly. and dropping a team 5 spots on 26/162 solely because of recent relief pitching performance is horseshit too. Wilson is usually golden. The team is not THAT much worse all of the sudden in the real Who's better because of a couple of "GROAN" sloppy relieving outings. Dodger fan or no Dodger fan. Far too granular of a view absolutely leads to the "can't see the forest for the trees" myopia
It would be possible that we could be playing well and then turn to crap later on. These are ranking for teams right now, so of course they're going to be judging teams twenty-five games in.
