The 2012/13 Offseason Thread

Discussion in 'Los Angeles DODGERS' started by BigDaddyKaine, Oct 2, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. MZA

    MZA MODERATOR Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    11,849
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    We would still find a way to lose.
     
    Irish and BigDaddyKaine like this.
  2. THINKBLUE

    THINKBLUE DSP Gigolo

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    41,885
    Likes Received:
    24,608
    In theory, there are some aspects of it that would make some sense, but I still don't like it...

    Bottom line is dumping guys like Andre and shoving reclamation stars and FAs everywhere isn't the answer. Even if you're getting some farm help in the process.

    Matt is seeing all of his friends disappear. Sure, Andre has some glaring flaws, but he's the most consistent inconsistent player you'll see. Highs and lows, but always ends up with the same bottom line. Plus he's a Dodger. He's one of the few core guys left and I don't want to enter 2013 hardly knowing my team anymore. I will always support the Dodgers regardless of who is on the team but completely stripping the identity so rapidly isn't sitting well (stripping Mccourt and Ned's Uribe projects is awesone...but getting rid of Andre isn't). I guess it's preference but I like Andre wearing Dodger blue.
     
    Irish and IBleedBlue15 like this.
  3. MZA

    MZA MODERATOR Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    11,849
    Likes Received:
    6,045
    I like Dre as a Dodger as well. Shipping him to get Hamilton just sounds dirty to me. Hamilton has a huge upside with his power, but at the same time, he's a headcase alcoholic. He would need a babysitter here in LA. What happens when he evetually falls off the wagon? Slump again? I'll eat crow if this happens and Hamilton takes us to the promise land. But we know where we stand with Andre.
     
    Irish and IBleedBlue15 like this.
  4. irish

    irish DSP Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    53,427
    Likes Received:
    41,154
    never been in favor of going after hamilton
    keep dre
     
  5. THINKBLUE

    THINKBLUE DSP Gigolo

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    41,885
    Likes Received:
    24,608
    I feel like Kemp, Bills, Kershaw, and Andre are what's left of a core that stuck through all the Mccourt crap and were a part of those teams that just weren't quite enough. And they should stay and get a chance here.

    And with what happened last year with not everything going as well as we thought with the additions...would bringing in a psychopath like Hamilton be a great idea?

    I genuinely believe buying the 2009 all star team is not the answer.
     
  6. THINKBLUE

    THINKBLUE DSP Gigolo

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    41,885
    Likes Received:
    24,608
  7. IBleedBlue15

    IBleedBlue15 DSP Stud

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    16,150
    Likes Received:
    5,815
  8. bestlakersfan

    bestlakersfan DSP Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,230
    Likes Received:
    2,207
    When did they dump Lee?
     
  9. irish

    irish DSP Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    53,427
    Likes Received:
    41,154
    that short lived couple months where they got Halladay
     
  10. bestlakersfan

    bestlakersfan DSP Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,230
    Likes Received:
    2,207
    I don't like Ethier going, but on some level sit makes sense. Puig is likely to push for a starting job by next year in ST. At a minimum they will want to start him then or mid 2014 simply because of the contract. Crawford and Kemp aren't going anywhere so two spots are locked up. Add in the fact that there are a Couple serviceable OFers who would take a 1 or maybe 2 year deal AND the likely haul of prospects we could bring in for Ethier and it really starts making sense. I'm not saying I like the idea of or the potential move, just saying it does make some sense in the big picture.
     
  11. bestlakersfan

    bestlakersfan DSP Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,230
    Likes Received:
    2,207
    True but that is so far from a parallel to this that it's not even relevant, hahah
     
  12. IBleedBlue15

    IBleedBlue15 DSP Stud

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    16,150
    Likes Received:
    5,815
    When they traded him to Seattle after they got Halladay.
     
  13. IBleedBlue15

    IBleedBlue15 DSP Stud

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    16,150
    Likes Received:
    5,815
    I'm just comparing how a player wants to be in a place for a long time, and then they get traded. He wanted to resign and then the Phils traded him. Andre resigned and then we're "open" to trading him.
     
  14. irish

    irish DSP Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    53,427
    Likes Received:
    41,154
    DODGERS REPORT
    What to do about: keeping Clayton Kershaw
    By Mark Saxon | ESPNLosAngeles.com
    October, 29, 2012 10:30am PT

    [​IMG]

    It seems like a no-brainer. If there were no agents in the world, it might get done in a matter of weeks.

    But the Dodgers have yet to begin talks with the representatives of Clayton Kershaw about locking up their young ace for years to come, general manager Ned Colletti told reporters Friday. Each month that goes by makes it more likely that Kershaw will leave as a free agent at the end of the 2014 season. Will those talks take place this winter?

    "It's probably something we'll think about," Colletti said.

    Why the tepid response? Well, it's not as easy as it sounds. Certainly Kershaw, 24, is the kind of young player you look to keep as long as possible. He's arguably the best pitcher in the National League, and his off-the-field reputation is as good as they come. He just became the youngest player to win the Roberto Clemente humanitarian award.

    But players typically make far more money if they allow themselves to reach free agency. How many teams would be lining up to offer Felix Hernandez a $150 million-plus deal this winter if his service-time clock had continued to tick?

    Instead, Hernandez is still under contract in Seattle for the next two years because -- at a point in his career identical to Kershaw's now -- he signed a five-year, $78 million contract in 2010. The Angels' Jered Weaver made a similar decision. Players give up dollars for the security of guaranteed money early and of staying where they grew up as players.

    Kershaw's agents likely will advise him to fend off the Dodgers' attempts at an extension. He doesn't seem like the kind of player motivated by money, but his extensive charity work might convince him to maximize his finances to do more. Hard to argue with that.

    To sign Kershaw long term right now also would carry some risk for the Dodgers. He had bouts of plantar fasciitis throughout the season. An impingement in his left hip surfaced late in the season. Both of those injuries can become debilitating and tend to be chronic.

    There's no doubt the Dodgers will make a full-fledged push to lock up Kershaw as long as they can. They've been successful with Matt Kemp, Andre Ethier and Chad Billingsley, and two of those deals were completed when Frank McCourt was the owner. The new owners probably will be willing to spend whatever it takes to keep their ace.

    But timing is everything in these kinds of talks. Perhaps they'll wait until midseason, reassuring themselves he can stay healthy. Maybe they'll wait until next fall, building their offer against what Kershaw figures to make in his final season of arbitration.

    It's not as if the deadline is upon us, but the closer it gets, the scarier it becomes.
     
  15. LAFord

    LAFord DSP Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2011
    Messages:
    8,465
    Likes Received:
    4,267
    I was wondering if there is a chance that a Crawford for ARod trade might be in the works. Two bad contracts. Ned mentioned the "use your imagination" thing when talking about Victorino returning. Was he refering to trading Crawford or trading Ethier?

    I'm stoked it's time for offseason shit, but I'm also scared of what Ned might dream up. Trading Ethier is a strange move but I admit I kind of expected it when there was no mention of a no trade clause in his contract extension. I think it's an option more for next year or after when Puig is deemed ready, now seems way to soon. His weakness vs. lefties is so disturbing to me especially when Crawford is the same way.

    I'm still 99% against Hamilton becoming a Dodger.
     
    Irish likes this.
  16. BigDaddyKaine

    BigDaddyKaine DSP Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2011
    Messages:
    12,051
    Likes Received:
    6,363
    I'd much rather keep Crawford than trade him for A-Shit.
     
  17. TuborgP

    TuborgP DSP Legend

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    3,487
    Likes Received:
    687
    From a Tweet based on unnamed sources. Hmmmmmm!
     
  18. Steve Lyons

    Steve Lyons Imbecile

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2012
    Messages:
    160
    Likes Received:
    86
    No need to be scared.

    I am going after A-Rod but not for the reasons you believe. There's a lot of stuff going on behind the scenes, things you couldn't know about or possibly even contemplate. Most of you pull up a list of pending free agents and hypothesize, guess and/or hope what's going to happen -- or worse, what you believe should happen. I will admit… some of you come up with ideas that are very creative and sensible, but for the most part you guys don't have the slightest clue of what it takes to get a deal done.

    Now that we have new owners, every other owner/GM/agent/player is looking to get over on us. This worried me initially, until Mark Walter assured me money was no object and to go after the best players regardless of cost. That's why we were willing to take on Carl Crawford's salary to get Adrian Gonzalez. And while I appreciate the optimism some of you are showing for Crawford to return to glory, it's unnecessary. And here's why:

    As I mentioned earlier, we are going after A-Rod. But we're going after him in the way we went after Carl Crawford -- as something we have to take in order to get what we want. Here's the deal currently on the table and, trust me, the Yankees are seriously considering it.

    Dodgers get:
    Alex Rodriguez
    Robinson Cano*
    Phil Hughes*
    Joba Chamberlain*

    Yankees get:
    Carl Crawford
    Andre Ethier
    Chris Capuano*
    Aaron Harang*
    Ted Lilly*
    Dee Gordon
    Mark Ellis*

    *free agent in 2014

    Before you scoff at the notion of the Yankee willingness to part with Cano, Hughes and Chamberlain, consider this -- * all three will be free agents in 2014, same with Capuano and Harang. The Yankees realize they'll have to pay through the nose to retain Cano, who's already made it clear he intends to pursue free agency. Hughes and Chamberlain won't come cheap either.

    Here's why the deal makes sense, for both teams.

    For the Yankees
    They get out from under the albatross contract for a player (in A-Rod) they really no longer want. Looking back, I bet they wish they'd kept him off their postseason roster. They do take on an almost equally bad contract in Crawford, but at least he's young and has time to figure things out. Plus, they'd love nothing more for him to succeed so they can shove it in Red Sox Nation's face.

    Mark Ellis takes over the 2B duties. He's not Cano, but he's solid.

    Capuano, Harang and Lilly immediately improve their starting rotation. Sabathia is beginning to break down and, regardless, is no longer the dominating pitcher he once was. Kuroda is not going back -- I spoke to his agent who said it's either the west coast for one year or back to Japan. I'll keep you posted on that.

    Ethier replaces Swisher in RF, and the Yankees are already salivating about the idea of him hitting to that short porch in right. They are also convinced they can get him to hit lefties. And since we don't actually have a hitting coach, they may be right.

    But the most overlooked part of the deal is Dee Gordon, who allows them to get younger and more athletic at shortstop and move the aging Jeter to 3B.

    For the Dodgers
    All I can say about A-Rod is that he has to be included to get the deal done. And as much as he's struggled, he improves the team playing third base. Or do you believe we should hold out hope for Juan Uribe? Hairston and Cruz are versatile and will still get plenty of playing time, especially if Alex struggles. But I don't think he will. In fact, I'm betting that he'll win comeback player of the year -- playing shortstop. I know Los Angeles is a big market, but it's a lot more low key than cities like New York or Boston. The fans will welcome him with open arms, and once he returns to form it'll be Mannywood and Fernandomania rolled into one. And if all that somehow doesn't come to fruition, remember... he had to be included to get the deal done.

    Southern California native Phil Hughes will thrive in a comfortable environment. He was 16-13 with a 4.23 ERA pitching in the AL East. Look for those numbers to improve dramatically, especially with his 3.59 K/BB ratio. Trust me, this guy was made to pitch at Dodger Stadium. He'll go well with the rest of the rotation I intend on assembling.

    The only question with Robinson Cano will be what number he'll wear since Walter Alston's #24 has long since been retired. The last time we had a second baseman of his caliber, he wore #42. I know he wants to pursue free agency, but there's no way he'll be able to refuse what we'll offer him. He will be a fixture at 2B in Dodger Blue for years to come.

    As for Joba Chamberlain, a healthy Joba Chamberlain, will be a savior in the bullpen. He and Kenley Janzen will split/share the set-up/closer duties, and both will excel.

    So here's how our lineup/roster should look on opening day:

    Lineup
    Cano 2B
    Crawford LF
    Kemp CF
    Gonzalez 1B
    Ramirez 3B
    A-Rod SS
    Puig RF
    Ellis C
    Kershaw P

    Rotation
    Kershaw
    Billingsley (Kuroda, if unavailable)
    Beckett
    Hughes
    Greinke

    Bench
    Gomes
    Federowicz
    Cruz
    Hairston

    Bullpen
    League
    Choate
    Chamberlain
    Belisario
    Elbert
    Guerra
    Guerrier
    Jansen

    Uribe (DFA)

    Don't ever pretend to know what I'm thinking. You think you know, but you don't... you really don't.
     
    bestlakersfan and Rube like this.
  19. irish

    irish DSP Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    53,427
    Likes Received:
    41,154
    :suicide:
     
  20. irish

    irish DSP Staff Member Administrator

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2011
    Messages:
    53,427
    Likes Received:
    41,154
    although I do like the uribe dfa part
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page